Rongrong 的个人资料Thornbird, I love照片日志列表 工具 帮助

Wang Rongrong

宠辱不惊,淡看庭前花开花落;
去留无意,漫随天外云卷云舒

Thornbird, I love

第 1 张,共 12 张
11月24日

噩梦

早上八点的闹铃响了,赖了一会床。半睡半醒间做了个梦:自己要和新加坡的合作项目开video-conference, 我作为联系人,约好对方周二晚上9点,我方周二早上十点。(注意杯具,就在这里! )同学们都知道, 新加坡和北京时间是一样的,和东部标准时间差十三个小时,人家的晚上九点,是我们早上八点。。。梦里的我也明白过来,于是惊醒


真正的郁闷在于,醒来发现梦是真的Crying

赶紧起来查邮件,人家等了一个小时后要求重新约时间(内疚死了)。还未回完邮件,老板就来电话,赶紧解释。哎,还得他由于相信我的时区换算也误了开会。太可怕了,以后再不要发生这类猪头错误。



11月1日

H.S. Tsien from Wiki

Qian Xuesen (simplified Chinese: 钱学森traditional Chinese: 錢學森pinyin: Qián Xuésēn; Wade-Giles: Tsien Hsue-shen) (11 December 1911 – 31 October 2009) was a scientist who made important contributions to the missile and space programs of both the United States and People's Republic of China. NASA documents commonly refer to him as H.S. Tsien.[1]

During the 1940s Qian was one of the founders of Jet Propulsion Laboratory[2] at the California Institute of Technology. During the red scare of the 1950s the United States government accused Qian of having communist sympathies. Qian was wrongfully imprisoned[3] at Alcatraz. Stripped of his security clearance, Qian decided to go back to China. After being under house arrest for 5 years, from 1950-55, Qian was released in exchange for the return of US pilots captured during the Korean war. Notified by U.S. authorities that he was free to go, Qian immediately arranged to go back to China in September of 1955 on American President Lines, Pres. Cleveland via Hong Kong. He returned to China and led the Chinese rocket program, and became known as the "Father of Chinese Rocketry" (or "King of Rocketry").

8月5日

sue 某同学

孔狗狗同学偷用我的洗面奶已经有段历史了,其实他自个儿的就在旁边的台子上,伸手可及。。。
我指出来后,人家嘿嘿两声,说:你的比我的好用。。。
那用就用吧,反正这东西用的慢,早点用完,我可以换新的。
可是:
昨天晚上洗脸的时候突然发现怎么压出来的和水一样一样的?仔细看了看,原先快被用完的洗面奶,貌似被加了水哎,汗死。。。这个土人!


5月11日

某人变成Dr. Kong了

今天孔同学答辩顺利,正式升级为孔博士。 Gift with a bow
4月30日

do my job

--What can I do for you?
--Your job.
4月1日

The coursework-only Ph.D. option

 

以下是早上收到的来自一位教授的群发给系里教授和研究生的邮件:

 

 

Colleagues,

 

I am investigating the feasibility of offering the coursework-only option

for getting a Ph.D.

Currently getting a Ph.D. requires that the majority of credits be derived

from research, which

can be problematic. Granting the Ph.D. degree based on the research

contributions contained in a doctoral dissertation

raises several issues, which include but are not limited to:

1) Research requires finding new ideas, developing new algorithms, or

building complex systems, which can turn frustrating.

2) Research is very labor-intensive and time-consuming, often requiring that

students spend evenings and weekends in the lab.

3) Ph.D. students have to publish their research in refereed venues, the

acceptance to which is highly-subjective and depends on the opinion of

anonymous reviewers.

4) Many Ph.D. students have developed an impressive ability to do well in

classes, and applying this ability to earning only some of the required

credits can be limiting.

5) Some Ph.D. students find it very frustrating having to answer the

question "when are you going to be done" with "when my research is good

enough and is published in the right places".

6) Writing a dissertation is a time-consuming undertaking that can take

months or even years to complete.

7) Ph.D. exams are often challenging to schedule, and committee members can

ask questions that are difficult to answer.

 

The coursework-only option would allow students to derive all the required

graduate credits from courses. One possible caveat is that coursework-only

Ph.D. students would have to maintain perfect GPA, with perhaps only a

couple of A- grades allowed.

 

The coursework-only Ph.D. option is only in early planning stages, and if

proposed, would have to be approved by the GPC, the college, and the

university. Nevertheless, I would like to solicit your feedback on this

option. If you a graduate student, please let me know if you may be

interested in pursuing the coursework-only option. If you are a faculty,

please let me know if you would consider recommending this option to your

students.

 

 

Regards,

Eli

 

回复一:

Very interesting and innovative!

I like this idea ;-)

回复二:

Hi, Eli.

I very much agree on your point 6).   I do not really see much
value in a voluminous thesis; in my opinion, one has  to be able to earn a Ph.D. based on publications only.  This is the case in several venerable  European institution (e.g. in Sweden), where the thesis is simply a collated set of student's pubs with some kind of unifying preface.


I can not see, however, how one can earn a Ph.D. without a serious research experience.  Yes, it does require finding new ideas, building new methods,  and it does involve lots of frustration (most of the time),  followed by moments of epiphany (sometimes),  but isn't it what it is all about?

                                           Just an opinion.

回复三:

Hi Eli,

Good idea, I would've loved for this option to have been available before I started and spent all this time. One question: would transfer credits count?

Another option that has been heavily recommended to me via email has been to confer a doctoral degree based on life work experiences. They say I don't even have to enroll, they will just send me my degree by mail -- how cool is that! It gets rid of the pesky coursework requirement as well. Glad I retrieved those emails from my spam mailbox in time.

I'm thankful that there are souls like you in academia who look out for us, especially on special days such as today. ;)

回复四:

I think this is an excellent idea.  I've been on a few job interviews lately, and they are absolutely grilling me on my coursework, and they don't seem particularly interested in my research. 

I do have one question, however.  It seems that it will be more difficult for faculty to do research without having graduate students working on the research option PhD.  Is it possible to do away with the research requirement for tenure and promotion at the same time?

 

回复五:

Eli,

I am so impressed by your innovative thinking. Don't worry about those who disagree with the idea. I am glad you are in my committee. Today, I agree 100% with you. However, I will have to give you my detailed opinion tomorrow. After I collect and burn everything I have done for the past 5 years towards a Ph.D.

Would I still need to have a committee to get a PhD?

- Amine C.

:):):):)

P.S. Best idea to enhance student-faculty interaction in the department.


我的:

The best idea i have seen today! It makes my day:))))